Price Guides December 2003: The Year in Component Prices
by Kristopher Kubicki on December 25, 2003 11:02 PM EST- Posted in
- Guides
AMD motherboards underwent few changes in the Socket A department over the last 12 months. The largest change came in the form of 400FSB chipsets, both from NVIDIA and VIA. Of course, most of us already knew that the original nForce2 chipsets were in fact 400FSB capable, designed from the beginning for expansion. VIA, on the other hand, had some severe trouble getting up to 400FSB. KT333, KT400, KT400A and then finally KT600 all came within 12 months of each other.
But then, the quintessential problem plagued both avenues of 400FSB; what is the purpose of 400FSB if there are no 400FSB chips? Athlon XP 3200+ became the first 400FSB AMD processor and although it was welcomed, the cost was prohibitive. A 3000+ 400FSB processor was released without any PR endorsements (think Athlon 64 3000+), but prices on that processor were also prohibitive. Even today, the cost of a 3000+ 400FSB XP processor costs the same as a Pentium4 2.8C.
All in all, the Athlon XP market for 2003 was a mess. Barton processors were the year's only saving grace. In the end, nForce2 became the better overclocker chipset over VIA's KT-anything. nForce2 has undergone some minor tweaks; particularly there have been a few (annoying) stepping changes in the last two months. However, like with the difference between steppings in the 865PE chips, the bigger Tier 2 motherboard manufacturers have enough originally stepped nForce2/Ultra/400 chips around to assure solid performance (Abit, Shuttle, Soltek).
5 Comments
View All Comments
SUOrangeman - Monday, December 29, 2003 - link
The new 74Gb Raptor should be much cheaper and widely available from more popular vendors now (i.e., NewEgg).-SUO
Phiro - Monday, December 29, 2003 - link
You need to look a little lower, divide. I saw one for $194 I believe.divide_by_zero - Sunday, December 28, 2003 - link
Perhaps it is a function of live updating in prices but..."There are still some excellent NVIDIA cards. Our particular favorite, the GeForceFX 5900 NON-Ultra has been a spectacular sub-$200 card for several months now."
And on the chart they range from $239.00 to $281.00
eBauer - Saturday, December 27, 2003 - link
$217 is OEM, $240 is retail I believe.Pumpkinierre - Friday, December 26, 2003 - link
You had the A64 3000+ (512k L2) at $217 3 days ago and now you say its $240. I imagine demand would be great on this cpu but is there an error in your reporting?