Intel Budget
While Intel offerings have tended to be more expensive than configurations from AMD, our Intel budget and AMD budget PCs are all but the same price. With prices all but the same you can choose your budget system based on other features that are important to you.
Intel Budget PC | ||
Hardware | Component | Price |
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 Wolfdale (2.93GHzx2 3MB Cache 1066 FSB) |
$145 |
Cooling | CPU Retail HSF | $- |
Video | On-Board | $- |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H nVidia GeForce 9400 | $120 |
Memory | OCZ Fatal1ty Edition 4GB DDR2-1066 OCZ2F10664GK ($28 after rebate) | $43 |
Hard Drive | WD Caviar GP WD5000AACS 500GB | $59 |
Optical Drive | Samsung 22X DVDRW/DL SH-S202G | $25 |
Audio | On-Board | $- |
Case | Cooler Master Elite 330 RC-330-KKN1-GP Mid Tower | $40 |
Power Supply | BFG Tech LS Series LS-550 550W SLI Certified, CrossFire Ready, 80 PLUS Certified ($20 Rebate) | $60 |
Base System Total | $492 | |
Display | ViewSonic VX2233wm Black 21.5" 5ms Widescreen 16:9 LCD (1920x1080) | $170 |
Speakers | Logitech R-20 12 Watts RMS 2.1 Multimedia Speaker | $18 |
Input | Microsoft CA9-00001 Black PS/2 Standard Keyboard and Optical USB/PS2 Mouse - OEM | $16 |
Operating System | Microsoft Vista Home Premium OEM | $99 |
Complete System Bottom Line | $795 |
The E7500 ups the bus to 1066 from the 800FSB of our entry-level Intel system. A dual-core 2.93GHz with 3MB of cache won't be a slouch in any department in your budget system. Yes the new i7 is faster, but it is also much more expensive. The question for a budget system is how good the performance is for the money spent. The E7500 SYSmark 2007 score is about 72% of the very top Core i7 965 Extreme. That is fantastic performance for a CPU that costs just $145. The E7500 is also a candidate for overclocking if you are inclined to move the performance a bit closer toward the 3.33GHz Core 2 Duo E8600, which reaches 88% of the i7 965 SYSmark performance.
The Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H is one of the most reasonable nVidia 9300/9400 chipset boards and features the GF9400 chipset at a price that matches most of the GF9300 equipped boards. With the 9400 integrated graphics performance is good enough to play most games at 1280x1024 on medium quality settings. This is leaps and bounds ahead of Intel's G45 series in this department. However, the HTPC feature set impresses us most. The only thing we are lacking is the ability to bitstream Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD MA (both of which no chipset currently supports). This chipset offers flawless HDMI/HDCP repeater compatibility, fully functional hardware acceleration, 8-channel LPCM output, and of course, stutter-free 24p playback.
Gigabyte loaded the GA-E7AUM-DS2H with four DDR2 DIMM slots featuring 16GB memory support, Realtek ALC889A HD audio with Dolby Home Theater, Realtek 8211CL Gigabit LAN, and five SATA 3Gb/s ports with RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 5 capabilities. Also included is eSATA 3Gb/s support, two IEEE 1394a ports, 12 USB 2.0 ports, one PCIe x16 slot, one PCIe x1 slot, two PCI slots, IDE connector, and video output including D-Sub, DVI-D, and HDMI ports. The BIOS is user friendly and features numerous overclock options for those wanting to get more out the E7500 processor along with decent temperature and fan speed monitoring options.
By this time, you may be wondering why we chose not to include an aftermarket CPU heatsink to go along with our CPU choices. For this budget, a $50 solution from Thermalright or Scythe was simply not an option, but with the stock AMD and Intel heatsinks incorporating heatpipe technology, we figured we'd still be good for a decent if not spectacular overclock.
The rest of the components are the same as those found in the AMD budget system. Again, for gaming purposes you can look to an upgraded GPU like the Radeon HD 4850 or 4870. Sound cards at this budget are simply an unnecessary luxury, and the onboard offerings continue to improve with each new motherboard generation. You can be reasonably happy with the onboard sound until you figure out if you want to go further with sound.
66 Comments
View All Comments
VaultDweller - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
Yeah, the GA-EP45-UD3R motherboard used for the Intel Budget does not have on-board video. That's a pretty critical omission.7Enigma - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
Ha, that's hysterical! I didn't even catch it (and just built my gaming rig with the UD3R), but that is quite a big omission. Funny story, I had been so used to my previous builds having even rudimentary integrated graphics I built the barebones system (cpu, ram, psu, hd) and turned it on hoping to get to the bios screen....only to realize there was no integrated graphics! I hate that first power on and like to have the least things possible in case of a short, but had to plug in my nice 4870 to POST.But yeah, fix that one guys! It's a great board, but doesn't fit this article. Running my E8500 @ 3.85GHz, stock voltage.
strikeback03 - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
Deja vu, didn't they do the same thing in one of the guides last year?7Enigma - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
I believe so. This is a problem that would never happen if the systems were actually built as opposed to just mixing and matching parts. It's been a constant request in the comments section, and while it would require shipping some parts around, it would be nice to have these systems built so some baseline benchmark comparisons could be made (ie instead of saying the AMD and Intel systems are similar in performance for price, you could show in this benchmark Intel is better, in this one AMD is better, and then select the components based on the individual's needs).More importantly it would prevent component incompatibility.
SpaceRanger - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
I was going to pass this article around to a couple of people who were looking to make a budget machine, but with inaccuracies as egregious as this, I can't do it.Slowly but surely I'm losing faith in AT as a site.
Wesley Fink - Monday, March 16, 2009 - link
The error is corrected and we are sorry the editing mistake disappointed you so much. The ability to correct errors in real-time is one of the real advantages of web-publishing, but we certainly don't want to abuse that capability.I think it is now safe for you to print and pass around the article.