Price Guides, March 2005: Storage
by Kristopher Kubicki on March 7, 2005 7:30 PM EST- Posted in
- Guides
Parallel ATA Hard Drives
In each guide edition, we take special notice at the difference in price between PATA and SATA as a whole. Aside from what motherboard manufacturers would have us think, Parallel ATA drives aren’t going anywhere in the near future, and we only need to look at the number of MaXLine III and 7200.8 drives as proof of that. Obviously, there are no NCQ benefits on PATA, but for drives that cost anywhere between 5 and 10 cents less per GB than their SATA counterparts, the lack of advanced SATA features might be worth the trade off.There are a lot of choices to sift through when determining the best hard drive choice. Like with many things in computers, you’re penalized for considering older (but not obsolete) hardware, such as the 80GB and smaller drives. The 40GB and 60GB drives actually have worse price per gigabyte ratios, and one would have to be mad to buy an $80 60GB hard drive over a $60 80GB one.
Last generation’s DiamondMaxs, Caviars and Deskstars top our cost per Gigabyte charts for March, but surprisingly, the 160GB and 200GB marks are the sweet spots for PATA compared to the 250GB sweet spot for SATA drives. All PATA drives under 250GB are cheaper than their SATA counterparts, but the differences are now measured in one or two dollars compared to the 20% difference from a year ago.
We still don’t recommend going all out on 300GB or 400GB drives just yet, although the price has come down considerably (more so on the SATA variants).
11 Comments
View All Comments
mongoosesRawesome - Monday, March 7, 2005 - link
Do all the DVD burners have riplock now? I just learned the NEC 3520A has it after I purchasing it few weeks ago. This might be a feature worth looking into for your DVD burner comparison. Even with a hacked firmware upgrade that was suppposed to remove riplock, it still feels slower than my lite-on dvd-rom drive.